Here's an example just to get you started:
http://www.wowinsider.com/2008/07/15/blizzard-wins-lawsuit-against-bot-makers/
I actually disagree with the judgement and think it sets a dangerous
precedent. But guess what, the boogieman won.
Really, please do tell me of the times you have been sued for breach
of a software user agreement. I cant wait to hear how often this
blight has been brought down apon your small business. Come on. Is
this a joke?
-----Original Message-----
From: "Brian Yennie" <bri...@qldlearning.com>
To: "How to use Revolution" <use-revolution@lists.runrev.com>
Sent: 3/21/2009 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: illegal creativity?
Randall,
Beside your questionable grasp of the law, you are making a straw man
argument. Even if "reasonable man" arguments worked as simply as you
imagine, it wouldn't follow that everything in a EULA other than
copyright is unenforceable. Believe it or not, licensing agreements
cover things other than copyright and sometimes are even upheld.
Furthermore, being "right" doesn't necessarily keep a small business
from being put out of business by a lawsuit. Often times the larger
entity just needs enough collateral damage (even in losing the case)
to ruin you.
It seems like you have been reading too much SlashDot and running too
few businesses.
I didnt know i was conversing with people from north korea and
iran. In the us, japan, canada, mexico, brazil, iceland, south
africa, russia, israel, india, and most of europe, etc. There is a
difference between criminal law and civil contract law. In most
moderen democratic societies, the wording in product contracts are
considdered about as binding as santa or the stuff car salesmen say
right before they go off to "talk to the manager". And that is
because of a liile thing called "the reasonable man". This
basically means that a contract or law cannot be inforced if it goes
outside of what would be reasonably considdered fair. Ant that is
because guys sitting behind big expensive oak drsks making big
salaries baid for by big companies can not be assumed to ever act
like reasonable men (bias and conflict of interest is a given).
Criminal law on the other hand is written by people we vote for and
require to "uphold the constitution". No such standerd is expected
in contract law. The only thing you can be expected to do when you
purchace software is to not copy and sell it. The rest is
hilariously written bs and the court treats it as so. Sorry. The
truth.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Ruslan Zasukhin" <sunsh...@public.kherson.ua>
To: "use-revolution" <use-revolution@lists.runrev.com>
Sent: 3/21/2009 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: illegal creativity?
On 3/21/09 4:13 AM, "Randall Reetz" <rand...@randallreetz.com> wrote:
All mosquitos are relevant. It is scale that matters here. Scale
and
reality. Else all of us would be behind bars and prohibited from
buying crest
toothpaste. Fair use and happy customers build brand loyalty
faster than fear
and loathing. Not only that, customer inovation and parasitic
coevolution is
a sign of health and currency. The lawyers play second fiddle to
the guys in
marketing and sales.
Randall,
I will add 2 cents ONCE.
If you vote publicly to break EULA of product which you have buy,
then
excuse me -- you publicly cry that you are a criminal man.
Please understand this.
[truncated by sender]
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
---
Brian Yennie
QLD Learning
(310)-367-7364
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
