On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:38 AM, J. Landman Gay <jac...@hyperactivesw.com> wrote: > Sarah Reichelt wrote: > >> Since this (like creator codes) depends on software developers setting >> up the right links, we need the RunRev standalone builder to start >> giving us the option to define a UTI for our apps, as well as, or >> instead of a creator code & file type. > > The SB has an entry for a "bundle identifier" which I thought was the same > thing. Or is that different?
I THINK that's different, but I don't really know. However here is how I think it works... Imagine you have an app that creates HTML files. You might want to just let the default browser handle them, so you would need a UTI with "public.html" If you wanted these files to open your app when double-clicked (even though they were standard HTML files that would work in a browser), you would need to set up your own UTI of say "com.mydomain.myapp.web-page". The same app might also produce text files, so you would also need a UTI with "com.mydomain.myapp.plain-text". The bundle identifier looks to be in the same sort of format, but you an only have one per app, and I don't think you would want it to be something completely general like "public.html". Cheers, Sarah _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution