Pierre, Smaller processor's time needs means it doesn't lock the computer all time like parallels used to?
:D On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Pierre Sahores <psaho...@free.fr> wrote: > Same here after a direct switch from Parallels 3.0 to Virtual Box, because > its smallest processor's time needs and because it never crashes ;-) > > Le 19 févr. 10 à 14:32, Andre Garzia a écrit : > >> I've used Parallels, VMWare Fusion and Virtual Box, in that order, >> now, I use only virtual box even as I've paid for Fusion 1.0 and >> Parallels from 1.0 to 3.0. > > Best Regards, > > -- > Pierre Sahores > mobile : (33) 6 03 95 77 70 > > www.woooooooords.com > www.sahores-conseil.com > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
