This has been covered extensively in the past 6 months and several
solutions proposed, depending on your project requirements.
go to
http://search.gmane.org/?query=trunc&group=gmane.comp.ide.revolution.user
put 'trunc' into the search for field
then 'gmane.comp.ide.revolution.user' into the group field
sort by 'newest' then search
You will find many posts, some are directly related to using 'step'
and its limitations.
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
On Mar 2, 2010, at 8:33 AM, Schwartz, Jonathan L. wrote:
I just found the following result.
(1.2 - 0.8)/0.2 = 2
trunc( (1.2 - 0.8)/0.2) = 1
--
I have previously reported the following:
on mouseUp
repeat with n = 0 to 1 step 0.1
put n&"," after aList
end repeat
put aList
end mouseUp
returns: 0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1,1.1,
It should stop at 1
Also 0 to 0.8 step 0.1 stops at 0.9 ... there are others
The use of the increment is consistent with the documentation.
Are there other similar problems that users are aware of ?
When applied properly, these can produce false results and make
analysis using runRev questionable.
I have reported these in the Rev Quality Control Center.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
