Richmond,
sorry im a mid level dyslexic and i tend to bung up names like that
when i type. apologies. (and no richard gaskin i did not mistake you
for richmond!)
I think there was reoccurring hope that one last classic build was
going to happen at some point, but just ended up sticking in there
past when i think that hope died... Actually probably good as i worry
that trying to get the full later feature sets to work in classic may
have made a buggy classic engine that would not have been helpful.
classic is pretty much dead end now days for new products, but can
still be supported with older stuff if really necessary, some point
the cords just have to be cut...
cheers
jeff
On Mar 29, 2010, at 1:03 AM, use-revolution-requ...@lists.runrev.com
wrote:
Who is 'Richard' ?
maybe bunging a Classic engine in RunRev 3, 3.5 and 4 was too much
like
trouble; however, as the
standalone settings palette does have acard for a Classic standalone
there is a bad case of
mixed messages going on.
sincerely, Richmond.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
