In the post : "Cross-platform software toolkits have never — ever — produced top-notch native apps for Apple platforms. Not for the classic Mac OS, not for Mac OS X". I think that about RunRev. For a Mac user it is the race to the bottom. Now, to build my applications, I do to build a large part of the interface... René
Le 9 avr. 2010 à 04:38, Jerry Daniels a écrit : > Gruber just post a more studied view of Apple's latest ruling (the infamous > Section 331) which we have been discussing in this thread: > > http://daringfireball.net/2010/04/why_apple_changed_section_331 > > I anticipate this latest change to the "rules" will generate quite fierce > debate among all concerned--which includes those of us who have bought into > revMobile. > > Best, > > Jerry Daniels > > Use tRev's buy link during your free trial to get 20% off: > http://reveditor.com/tag/shouldiswitch > > On Apr 8, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Jerry Daniels <jerry.dani...@me.com> wrote: > >> This link is interesting: >> >> http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1250946 >> >> In the post referenced above, the multi-platform aspect of pre-compilers is >> called out as one of the main reasons for the new rule. This is worth a read >> and from one of the foremost finders of software developers which these days >> means iPhone and iPad. >> >> The crew in Scotland are usually very conservative in their approach in most >> matters. So, would be surprised if they've painted themselves into a corner. >> >> As far as "the team" being way ahead of us...this late breaking news. It's >> not a question of lack of technical chops or foresight. >> >> Best, >> >> Jerry Daniels >> >> Use tRev's buy link during your free trial to get 20% off: >> http://reveditor.com/tag/shouldiswitch >> >> On Apr 8, 2010, at 7:05 PM, "J. Landman Gay" <jac...@hyperactivesw.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Jerry Daniels wrote: >>>> I have trouble believing that a pre compiler is a problem. Any >>>> framework is essentially the same thing. RevMobile doesn't actually >>>> compile anything as far as I can tell. It creates a file(s) to be >>>> compiled by Objective-C, yes? >>> >>> Yeah. Nobody panic. As far as I can tell, the rules haven't changed much, >>> the team is aware of the limitations, and RevMobile doesn't break them. >>> There is no interpreted layer in a built RevMobile app; Rev scripts go >>> directly from RevTalk to binary. We have limitations on using "interpreted" >>> commands in our scripts, and they won't be accepted -- i.e., we can't use >>> do, value, or any parameters that aren't already evaluated before they're >>> sent (see the revmobile docs about that. It's not as bad as it sounds.) >>> >>> Kevin may have more to say about it, but I think the team is way ahead of >>> you guys. ;) >>> >>> -- >>> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com >>> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> use-revolution mailing list >>> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >>> subscription preferences: >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> _______________________________________________ >> use-revolution mailing list >> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
