I made no such claims. I said that such output capacity wouldn't interfere with day to day xtalk use. I write artificial intelligence. I have always used xtalk. It allows me to think and create using the same cognitive resources. It would not be trivial to get runrev to export C source. But it would be invaluable to users and to the longevity and reach of the runrev product and market.
-----Original Message----- From: Chipp Walters <ch...@altuit.com> Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 2:17 PM To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution@lists.runrev.com> Subject: Re: Check out Jerry's new videos I take it, by reading your plethora of rather "uninformed" posts, you're not a technical person. So, it's understandable you would compare creating an Xtalk to C translator as trivial as exporting an image in GIF format. The fact is, it's not. If you think this is a marketable idea, then by all means run with it. You'll want to hire someone technical to help guide you. Chipp Walters CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc On May 8, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Randall Lee Reetz <rand...@randallreetz.com> wrote: > If you don't need to output C than you don't output c. I don't need gif > output but photshop allows it for those that do... _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
