On 9/5/10 1:56 AM, "Randall Lee Reetz" <rand...@randallreetz.com> wrote:
> That runrev could export C source would in no way interfere with the ongoing
> activity of runrev users (should they choose not to export their stacks into C
> source).
>
> The capacity to output C SOURCE WOULD OPEN THE REACH OF REV USERS TO ALMOST
> ANY PLATFORM AND IN A PROFESSIONAL LEVEL. CODE COMPILED IN C RUNS WAY WAY WAY
> FASTER IN ALMOST ALL SITUATIONS. BYTE CODE IS SLOW IN COMPARISON.
> INTERPRETED EVEN MORE SO. (SORRY ABOUT THE UPPERCASE... MY PHONE IS STUCK).
Hi guys,
I have miss start of this thread about videos,
But it seems here is discussed
REV to C/C++ or Obj-C
And I want say - YES this looks for me as the best choice for REV.
Why not?
And this can open way to iPhone as I understand.
RevMobile before it seems was going generate c# sources?
Strange choice as for me.
Main engine should go to C,
Some parts of REV project also to C
And GUI part of REV project to ObjC - Cocoa.
In this way you don't break iPhone OS v4 license.
And it is possible to automate in background full process:
generation of sources, xcode project,
compile and link true iphone APP.
all in tmp folder ..
all by single click BUILD in REV.
I do not see technical problems her.
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
