My apology to the group for the snarky email response. When I read the response from Lyn to Richard's email I interpreted it as a response from RunRev on why they were no longer releasing revCGI updates. It appeared to me the reason that rev was not releasing updates was due to a concern about not being able to get the word about updates and such out to the community. I should have realized I was mis-reading the thread.
My mistake. On May 14, 2010, at 6:12 PM, Michael Kann wrote: > -- Sent last post too soon! -- > ---------------------------------------------------- > Kee Nethery wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------- > I know that given the privacy concerns of our business, we cannot use the Rev > engine hosted on a machine that we do not control. > ---------------------------------------------------- > Kee, > > Am I missing something obvious? If you control the machine then you can put > the Rev engine on it. Usually the problem is the other way around. People > want to use a commercial server but can't get the server people to let them > upload the engine. > > Mike _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
