I have never seen a handler nested inside another. It would mean; on soAndSo on doThis end doThis end soAndSo
There must be a semantic misunderstanding here. Perhaps what is meant is a handler call: on soAndSo doThis end soAnd So One might say that a handler sort of lives inside another. Craig Newman In a message dated 5/27/10 11:35:27 AM, r...@robelko.com writes: > No, that keeps it local to the object that contains the handler. I > >*think* I'm talking about one handler nested inside another one. > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
