On 08/09/2010 16:02, "Mark Schonewille" <m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com> wrote:
> This is no news. The process started 2 years ago and has now been completed. > The only goal of the merge was to take out a competitor. It is sad indeed, > because I was a happy user of VersionTracker. VT helped me to publish software > and generate money. C|Net makes this impossible, unless I am willing to pay > for their services, which I am not. From experience, I must say that C|Net's > services are of very low quality, the support department is largely > disfunctional, the developer portal is broken in many places (I'm unable to > update my old products at the moment), and your new software is listed after a > very long delay, when you're about to release yet another version already. If > you don't pay, your software will never appear on the front page. All this is > very different from what VT once was. I have to say that I agree. VersionTracker worked really well. Every time we've worked with download.com we've found it to be hard to use, for the service to be slow and inefficient. The site is simply not as much fun for the end user either. I hope they learn something from VersionTracker and upgrade it, because if not this is not a good thing. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ ke...@runrev.com ~ http://www.runrev.com/ RunRev - Software construction for everyone _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
