"ditto" works perfectly.
Resource fork is maintained. File is copied with creator type etc all intact and boots into the right application.
Two caveats which I would like to understand, just for my training on shell usage:
a) I could not get this to work:
get shell ("ditto -rsrcFork ""e &(gRemotePath&gRemoteFile)"e&"e& fld "localfolder""e)
instead I had to do this:
put ("ditto -rsrcFork ""e &(gRemotePath&gRemoteFile)"e&"e& fld "localfolder""e) into tCommand
get shell (tCommand)
why?
b) use of "get" why is it needed? is it because this is a function and not a command?
Thanks, this list is such a great resource...
Aloha from Kauai Sivakatirswami
On Sunday, October 5, 2003, at 09:28 PM, Brian Yennie wrote:
I can't speak to revCopyFile, but on OS X there is a shell command for copying files with resource fork intact. If that's not what revCopyFile is using, you could try it:
get shell("ditto -rsrcFork ""e&sourcePath"e&"e&destPath"e)
You might try it out first in Terminal.app if you haven't used shell() before. For more information about ditto, type "man ditto" into Terminal.app.
If that's what revCopyFile uses already, maybe it's a remote volume / server problem?
HTH
Brian
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution