> Thanks for the explanation. > How would you use: > > wait for messages > and > wait with messages > > ?? > > Would it be something like: > > wait for 4 seconds with messages
Right, allowing processing to continue while it waits. > wait for messages > > (pauses handler until *any* message is received? and why > would I ever use > this?) I don't know... this one seems a little goofy, but I'm sure there was a reason to have it developed. :-) Another one I like is this one: global gStatus wait until gStatus is "go" with messages This allows you to stop at a line and wait until a global has been set to a particular value while other things are going on. GIH (glad it helps) Ken _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
