On 2/2/04 12:55 PM, "J. Landman Gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/1/04 8:20 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote: > >> >> On Feb 1, 2004, at 9:05 PM, Doug Lerner wrote: >> >>> >>> I don't see how there could possibly be. This is a substack and inside >>> the >>> substack's script there is the closeStack handler. >> >> >> >> Doug, that was exactly what I had. A closeStack in a substack that I >> wanted to work when I closed the substack but instead I "think" the main >> stack was grabbing the closeStack and not the substack even though the >> closestack message was 'local' to the substack. > > If that's true, then it sounds like a bug. I just made a simple set of > test stacks, though, and I couldn't reproduce the behavior. There must > be something else going on. > > My main stack has one stack handler: > > on closeStack > answer the target > end closeStack > > Substack has one stack handler: > > on closeStack > put "closing sub" > end closeStack > > I click the closebox in the substack and "closing sub" appears in the > message box. I never get an answer dialog. That's what I want to happen here too. :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
