Mac OS 9 and Mac OS X are completely different systems. OS X is Unix, in fact.
doug On 2/24/04 5:11 AM, "Marian Petrides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why? > > Win 95, 98, XP are all one license, right? So why would OS 9 and OS > X be separate? > > I hate to get back into the pricing debate again, but once again the > pricing model defies logic. Most frustrating. (And, no it's not > relevant to me, I bought the whole magilla and glad I am thank you!) > > M > > On Feb 23, 2004, at 2:55 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > >> On 2/23/04 10:35 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: >> >>> But as for getting going with Mac, I believe all Mac versions are >>> included in the Mac license, which would mean both OS X and the older >>> Classic. I can't imagine RunRev would charge separately for the >>> defunct OS 9. >> >> Actually, it's a separate license. >> >> -- >> Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com >> _______________________________________________ >> use-revolution mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution