On Thu, 20 May 2004 21:57:38 -0700, Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Graham Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found out that you can't force
> Windows users to install QT, but that's
> another story...

Of course you can't force anyone to install anything, but if the
benefits are compelling enough it's not hard to get users to choose to
install QT, and even easier if you get the free license from Apple to
include the QT installer on your product's CD.  With the HyperRESEARCH
product I make for ResearchWare we haven't had a single complaint from
Win users about installing QT; given the wide range of formats it allows
our product to support they're often glad we use it.

But of course acceptance will depend on the market the software
addresses.  What sort of audience are you finding resistance to QT in?

UK Schools - very few have the time or inclination to go through more than the minimum installation process, especially for a relatively inexpensive product. Of course here and there, there are highly IT-literate schools or proper IT departments who would be responsible for the installation work and for the policy decision to install QT, perhaps centrally, but you can't count on it. This is the advice I get from my publisher who is in touch with literally thousands of state (=publicly funded) schools in the UK. A further insight is that these teachers are so hard-pressed that apart from the relative few who take a direct interest in computers, they will seldom feel able to take the time to understand any intricate functionality in a PC application, even if an investment of understanding would in the end lead to a reduction in time and effort. It's a tough world out there.


Of course YMMV

Graham

---------------------------------------------------
Graham Samuel / The Living Fossil Co. / UK & France



_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to