I wonder what that exactly means: no 2.7.0 but 2.7.1. or 2.7.2 or no
2.7.x at all.
If the latters, RunRev could be accused of false advertisement. I
wonder whether that is the same offense in Scotland as it is in the
US. Furthermore, if they were planning not to have any 2.7.x release,
why would they remove 2.6.x?
I guess I am trying to stay optimistic and see their action in best
possible light :)
Here is exactly what Heather told me...
<snip>
I am not expecting to see a 2.7 Classic version of Revolution I'm afraid.
<snip>
on 3/7/06 4:09 PM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
Hi Dave... It's Rev 2.6.1 and you have to ask Heather directly. It's
doubtful that 2.7 or later will get to OS 9... Jim
I hope you are wrong, Jim. And the RR web site states that OS9
version is coming, whatever that means.
> _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
