Are we trying to establish the existence of a handler or to get the
text of a handler? And are we including handlers that are commented out?
Mark
On 20 Mar 2006, at 02:01, Dick Kriesel wrote:
On 3/19/06 5:12 PM, "Geoff Canyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I feel like the harbinger of doom here (with Alex as my able partner
in doomsaying) but:
This would still be subject to failure if, anywhere in the script, /*
or */ appeared _not_ as block comment delimiters, but as part of a
string.
www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/fools+rush+in+where+angels
+fear+to+tre
ad.html
Imagine we first remove comments that start with "--" and then
start looking
for block comments. If a "/*" follows an even number of quotes, it
starts a
block comment. If it follows an odd number of quotes, it's
embedded in a
string. After a "/*" starts a block comment, then the next "*/"
ends the
comment. Right?
Or do the angels see even more of the devil in the details?
-- Dick
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
