Mark Smith wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2007, at 10:47, jbv wrote:
>> In order to check if array "var" contains any element,
>> the following test must be used instead :
>> if the keys of var = empty then
>>
>> I was just wondering if you guys would find this behaviour
>> "normal" ?
...
> JB, there are various requests in place at the qa center for
> enhancements to both the implementation and documentation of arrays
> in Rev (type 'array' into the search field, and you'll see them).
>
> As it stands, Revs arrays are just different from normal variables,
> and what you've found is the normal behaviour, so maybe you might
> want to vote for a documentation update at least.
But here's the tough question: if "var" contains an array, then no
valid data can be returned by accessing it without the name of one of
its keys. So what should "var" return when checked directly?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
