Almost all commercial products in the same market are compiled.
Interpreted languages, and thus languages that can change code during
runtime, are most often open source.
That said, I'd love to be able to use more lines in do, or setting more
lines of a script.
On 13 May 2007, at 17:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/13/2007 at 10:16 AM "Viktoras Didziulis" wrote:
It is likely to prevent somebody using Revolution studio to create a
competing RAD environment. Unfortunately this also prevents from
implementing any kind of scripting, or complex formula translations
which
would not compete with the RAD in any way. Therefore in order to
implement
end-user scripting for own products (like allowing user to create
decision
trees with formulas in nodes) some of us have to resort to other
languages
via shell or SQL92/95 as alternatives. I guess the most efficient way
is
to
use SQL because of its tight integration with Revolution through its
database modules.
Best!
Viktoras
Shouldn't this limitation be obsoleted? I had read once that RunTime
had no
fear of a competing IDE, and in fact, they incourage it. It was
explained
that a license to the engine is still required, so RunTime would still
benefit from sales. This ancient 10 line limit is well, "limiting" us
as
developers. Do any of Revs competing languages have such a limit
imposed on
built standalone apps?
Roger Eller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
