Oh no, we agree on something...
Cheers,
Luis.
On 7 Jun 2007, at 04:25, Chipp Walters wrote:
On 6/6/07, Samuel M. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem I have with runrev is not open source per se but that
with a paid model the incentive
is for the developer to release "feature" updates that sound good to
justify paying upgrade fees but
that for the most part are not nearly as valuable to a developer as
maintaining stable quality code.
Mature open source on the other hand has the opposite incentive,
stable code and only add features that
people are willing to invest time in to get so you get a different
evolution of features over time.
Brilliant.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
