On 6/8/07, David Bovill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are reasons that there are very very few robust developer contributed libraries in our community while there are good ones in python and ruby, and OK ones in php. This can and should change, and a carefully planned open source strategy would be a low cost part of that change.
In 2002, I built an website titled "RROpenSource" which had the ability for users to contribute Open Source RR projects online. Ready to launch, I disclosed it only to a few, I believe you included. If I recall correctly, you mentioned you were working on a similar project and requested I not release RROpenSource as you were almost ready to launch. So, it never came to light. Just wondering if that is still part of your 'carefully planned open source strategy' ? I suppose that project probably ended up in the 'under 10%' activity filter as well. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
