"Marian Petrides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wisely observed on Fri, 21 Sep 2001 01:01:00 > > In keeping with Tom's comments and those of others, one thing that has helped me deal with the price of this upgrade is that it really is NOT a 1.1 upgrade but has so many additional features (including OS X support--or so someone unofficial has said--confirmation would be appreciated) that it probably should be called v 2.0. > > Would $169 be a reasonable price for an upgrade from v 1 to v 2? I suspect most of us would feel it is. > > My 2 cents worth. > > Marian > Exactly! And BTW, a look at MetaCard's history will confirm this as well. Scott (and so Kevin) is *extremely* conservative with his numbering system. Each "minor" upgrade has added so many new features and functionality that it is hard to keep up with -- much less document properly. Not even Supercard was so aggressive about improvements in functionality. The improvements made in Hypercard over the years were minor. MetaCard and Revolution has all of them beat completely. Raymond
