+5 - Definitely.
I'd vote higher, as SQLJ support is long overdue for open source DBs,
but the sooner the better.
Perfect, and thank you for getting on this.
Jeff Stahl
Clinton Begin wrote:
Hi everyone,
A group of developers have approached us with a contribution of code
to patch iBATIS so that it supports SQLJ.
If you've never heard of SQLJ, here are two links...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQLJ
http://www.google.com/trends?q=sqlj
The future of SQLJ is not clear to me, nor is its adoption rate over
time. Certainly iBATIS has a broader user base than SQLJ does.
So the question is: Should we support SQLJ as a feature of iBATIS?
+5 == Absolutely... iBATIS will be better for it.
+1 == Yes, support SQLJ.
0 == Doesn't matter to me.
-1 == No, keep them separate.
-5 == No way. iBATIS is better off without it.
This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
Cheers,
Clinton
