+1. Support to all databases is definitely a great plus to have. -Sundar
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Clinton Begin <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi everyone, > > A group of developers have approached us with a contribution of code > to patch iBATIS so that it supports SQLJ. > > If you've never heard of SQLJ, here are two links... > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQLJ > http://www.google.com/trends?q=sqlj > > The future of SQLJ is not clear to me, nor is its adoption rate over > time. Certainly iBATIS has a broader user base than SQLJ does. > > So the question is: Should we support SQLJ as a feature of iBATIS? > > +5 == Absolutely... iBATIS will be better for it. > +1 == Yes, support SQLJ. > 0 == Doesn't matter to me. > -1 == No, keep them separate. > -5 == No way. iBATIS is better off without it. > > This vote will remain open for 72 hours. > > Cheers, > Clinton >
