Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 schrieb Chris Miner: > Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 15:56 schrieb Oliver Lietz: > > > Yeah, but that complicates the installation of your module. Assuming > > > again that you have a module, it is straightforward to add the required > > > code to your registerRepositories(ModuleDefinition) method. > > > > Maybe, but why not declare this stuff in you module definition and let > > Magnolia handle it? > > But it can't handle it without your patch right?
Right. > And the patch should be > part of 3.1? Including it in the module definition is absolutely a better > solution. I hope so. I wonder how other users work with data which is not page/paragraph related. @Will: Is "Magnolia for Structured Data" (fastforward.ch) just a proposal or have you some working code? O. ---------------------------------------------------------------- for list details see http://www.magnolia.info/en/developer.html ----------------------------------------------------------------
