Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2007 schrieb Will Scheidegger: > Well, that was rather easy. Next problem: > > The patched code requires workspace definitions like this: > > <workspaces> > <workspace> > <name>workspacename</workspacename> > </workspace> > </workspaces> > > whereas the original code expects something like this: > > <workspaces> > <workspace>workspacename</workspace> > </workspaces> > > Unfortunately not all of the original code gets patched! So if you > change the workspace definition to the new syntax namespace > registration works, but the workspaces are not set up. If you leave > them in the original syntax... well you can guess what's happening.
Hello Will, have you applied all patches from MAGNOLIA-1346 and MAGNOLIA-1348? MAGNOLIA-1346 contains the patches for existing workspaces. Can you tell me what is not getting patched? Maybe the source changed too much and the patches (3 month old) are rejected? > @ Oliver: May I make a suggestion? Your extension to Magnolia is > great and very important to many of us I would guess. Would you mind > setting up a (wiki?) page with _all_ patches necessary? That would be > awesome. I hope that custom node types and namespaces will be part of 3.1. So I think it will be more useful to port/refactor my working products module which relies on MAGNOLIA-1346, MAGNOLIA-1348 and multi value properties from client's namespace to info.magnolia and from java5 to 1.4. You could also try my complete diff (I'm on trunk) instead of many small as a quick solution. But I'm sure we can solve this. O. ---------------------------------------------------------------- for list details see http://documentation.magnolia.info/docs/en/editor/stayupdated.html ----------------------------------------------------------------
