On Wednesday 26 October 2005 00:13, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso wrote: > > I.e. the implementation was written, is present in the tree, but due to > this: > > #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK > #include <linux/rwsem-spinlock.h> /* use a generic implementation */ > #else > #include <asm/rwsem.h> /* use an arch-specific implementation */ > #endif > > it was probably _NEVER_ compiled!!!
Actually it was, but we switched it back because there were some doubts on the correctness of the xchg based implementation and the generic one looked much cleaner. So far nobody showed a significant performance different too. I should probably remove asm/rwsem.h. Don't apply please. -Andi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
