On Wednesday 26 October 2005 00:22, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wednesday 26 October 2005 00:13, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso wrote: > > I.e. the implementation was written, is present in the tree, but due to > > this: > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK > > #include <linux/rwsem-spinlock.h> /* use a generic implementation */ > > #else > > #include <asm/rwsem.h> /* use an arch-specific implementation */ > > #endif > > > > it was probably _NEVER_ compiled!!!
> Actually it was, but we switched it back because there were some doubts > on the correctness of the xchg based implementation and the generic > one looked much cleaner. So far nobody showed a significant performance > different too. > I should probably remove asm/rwsem.h. That's fine too, the current situation is clearly bogus. Thanks for the quick answer. > Don't apply please. Agreed. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
