On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:12:12PM +0100, Nix wrote:
> Oh, and, it's pedantic of me, I know, but what does this do if time goes
> backwards in the NO_HZ case? (Or is handling that a 2.6.26 thing?)
In all cases, it holds time steady until the host catches up with what
the guest thinks the time should be.
I noticed you wrapped last_tick business in one of the ifdefs - I
didn't look carefully to see whether that would explain the behavior
difference. I just made it unconditional.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
