On 14 May 2008, Jeff Dike verbalised: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:12:12PM +0100, Nix wrote: >> Oh, and, it's pedantic of me, I know, but what does this do if time goes >> backwards in the NO_HZ case? (Or is handling that a 2.6.26 thing?) > > In all cases, it holds time steady until the host catches up with what > the guest thinks the time should be.
Yeah, that's what I was doing too: but mine didn't work. Odd. > I noticed you wrapped last_tick business in one of the ifdefs - I > didn't look carefully to see whether that would explain the behavior > difference. I just made it unconditional. The only reason I wrapped it in the ifdefs was because the !NO_HZ case had to keep the skew calculations up to date, while the NO_HZ case didn't have to bother. It shouldn't have affected anything else. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel