On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 17:22, richard -rw- weinberger
<richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:49, richard -rw- weinberger
>> <richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Andrew, Linus, Jeff, ... anyone?
>>> Please apply this patch.
>>>
>>> CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is still broken. :(
>>
>> I wanted to verify Tim's patch, but after enabling CONFIG_STATIC_LINK,
>> it fails to link
>> (with or without your patch):
>>
>
> BTW: Does CONFIG_STATIC_LINK work for you when you revert commit
> 5d150a97f9391f5bcd7ba0d59d7a11c3de3cea80 (um: Clean up linker script
> using standard macros)?

Still the same linking errors ;-(

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to