On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 17:22, richard -rw- weinberger > <richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:49, richard -rw- weinberger >>> <richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Andrew, Linus, Jeff, ... anyone? >>>> Please apply this patch. >>>> >>>> CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is still broken. :( >>> >>> I wanted to verify Tim's patch, but after enabling CONFIG_STATIC_LINK, >>> it fails to link >>> (with or without your patch): >>> >> >> BTW: Does CONFIG_STATIC_LINK work for you when you revert commit >> 5d150a97f9391f5bcd7ba0d59d7a11c3de3cea80 (um: Clean up linker script >> using standard macros)? > > Still the same linking errors ;-( >
Are you using a non-x86 environment? Maybe CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is more broken than i thought. Cheers, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
