On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:04:01PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> OK, I understand what's going wrong and how to reproduce the
>> signal-to-parent problem.  It does look like a bug in vmlinux.
>>
>> It happens if the init process (PID 1) inside the VM gets a segfault.
>
> To add an additional data-point, applying the attached patch causes
> the rogue SIGTERM-to-parent signal to disappear.  So at least we know
> where it comes from!

I think we should call setsid() at UML startup.
Thanks for reporting that issue.

BTW: You know that UML has a management console?
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/mconsole.html

Killing UML by SIGTERM is not nice. :D

-- 
Thanks,
//richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to