Hi!
> >>@@ -184,6 +179,8 @@ machine_halt(void)
> >> void
> >> machine_power_off(void)
> >> {
> >>+ do_kernel_poweroff();
> >>+
> >
> >poweroff -> power_off for consistency.
> >
> Dunno; matter of personal preference. I started with that, but ultimately went
> with poweroff to distinguish poweroff handler functions from existing code,
> specifically kernel_power_off().
That works for you, but once it is merged, it is ugly/confusing typo.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
