On 10/09/2014 01:24 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>>> @@ -184,6 +179,8 @@ machine_halt(void)
>>>> void
>>>> machine_power_off(void)
>>>> {
>>>> + do_kernel_poweroff();
>>>> +
>>>
>>> poweroff -> power_off for consistency.
>>>
>> Dunno; matter of personal preference. I started with that, but ultimately
>> went
>> with poweroff to distinguish poweroff handler functions from existing code,
>> specifically kernel_power_off().
>
> That works for you, but once it is merged, it is ugly/confusing typo.
> Pavel
>
Ok, no problem, I'll change it.
Guenter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
