On Jan 17, 2008 9:52 AM, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 17, 2008 9:37 AM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Peter Reilly wrote: > > > On Jan 17, 2008 12:37 AM, James Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> What is the base target version for ant development these days? Java 5? > > >> > > > It is java5, however, the ant jars need to be able to work gracefully in > > > a java1.3 and java1.4 env (i.e. support what can be supported). > > >> James > > > > > > and Java 1,3-compatible language features...it has to compile on older > > versions. What we can do is have a directory of java6+ code that isnt > > built on Java <6. > > I do not think that the ability to compile ant on < java5 is necessary. > The reaon I think this is that the resultant output will not be a complete ant product. Peter
> Peter > > > > > > -- > > > Steve Loughran http://www.1060.org/blogxter/publish/5 > > Author: Ant in Action http://antbook.org/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
