> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: jeudi 17 janvier 2008 12:24 > To: Ant Users List > Subject: Re: Redirecting <javac> compile errors > > Peter Reilly wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2008 9:52 AM, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Jan 17, 2008 9:37 AM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Peter Reilly wrote: > >>>> On Jan 17, 2008 12:37 AM, James Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> What is the base target version for ant development these days? Java 5? > >>>>> > >>>> It is java5, however, the ant jars need to be able to work gracefully in > >>>> a java1.3 and java1.4 env (i.e. support what can be supported). > >>>>> James > >>> > >>> and Java 1,3-compatible language features...it has to compile on older > >>> versions. What we can do is have a directory of java6+ code that isnt > >>> built on Java <6. > >> I do not think that the ability to compile ant on < java5 is necessary. > >> > > The reaon I think this is that the resultant output will not be a > > complete ant product. > > > ooh, now there's an interesting thought. Java5+ only but test on Java > 1.3, 1.4, 6.0, 6.4, harmony, java7... >
Did someone have experiences with http://retroweaver.sourceforge.net/ ? Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
