Sounds perfect! Will you only release the JPA stuff? I guess then that Aries JPA 0.4 is compatible with 0.3 of the other Aries projects? I currently use the 0.3 versions.
Now that you seem to release the sub projects independently (which I guess is good since it enables more frequent releases) it is important to document what versions of the different sub projects are compatible with each other (and that they are tested together). /Bengt 2011/6/28 Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> > +1 I can help out. I'm looking forward to trying out our new release > process :-) > > Jeremy > > On 28 June 2011 11:17, Timothy Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm happy to look at getting a new release of the Aries JPA container. > There > > are a couple of hoops to jump through with the build, but now that > Equinox > > 3.7 and the OSGi 4.3 API are available it should be possible for us to > get > > the build into a release-able state > > > > Regards, > > > > Tim > > > > ________________________________ > > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:18:51 +0000 > > Subject: Re: 0.4 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > > Hello Alasdair, > > I endorse the point of view of both Bengt and Harald. It will be very > > interesting to release the enhancement allowing the runtime enhancer. > This > > feature is more 'compatible' with the loose-coupling best-practice. Why > > should my 'entities bundles' know about their JPA Provider? > > I believe that the big work has been already completed by implementing > > successfully the run-time enhancer. There is just a small but important > step > > that remains: officially offer that important feature to the public. > > Warm regards. > > > > Younes Ouadi > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Thanks for your reply Alasdair, > > Reading the documentation about the JPA support it seems like in 0.4, it > is > > no longer necessary to list all classes in the persistence.xml. That's an > > improvement I'm really interested in which is why asked about the 0.4 > > release. I also use Karaf+Camel and I'm used to more frequent releases > than > > what seems to be the case with Aries. > > /Bengt > > 2011/6/27 Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]> > > > > Hi, > > I don't think there are any "plans". In the past releases have been more > "on > > demand". > > After the 0.3 release we decided to move to a pre-bundle release process > so > > their wont be a big 0.4 release like there were previously. Some bundles > > might be at 0.4 and some at 0.3.1. > > Do you need a release? > > Alasdair > > > > On 24 June 2011 13:04, Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Anyone know when Aries 0.4 is planned for? > > /Bengt > > > > > > > > -- > > Alasdair Nottingham > > [email protected] > > > > > > >
