Yes, it would be nice to have subsystems being independent of blueprint imho.
2014-04-14 16:37 GMT+02:00 Cristiano Gavião <[email protected]>: > Hi Mark. > > Well, last time I tried, the subsystems service (zero) wasn't registered > without blueprint bundles in active state. > Seems that a dependency of subsystem, application-modeller, has a direct > dependency to blueprint: > https://github.com/apache/aries/tree/trunk/application/application-modeller/src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/blueprint > > regards, > > Cristiano > > > On 11-04-2014 11:45, Mark Nuttall wrote: > > Hello, > I've looked over the code and can only see a dependency on blueprint in > the subsystem-itests pom. So there's a dependency on blueprint to run the > itests, but I cannot see a runtime dependency from subsystem-core on > blueprint, Have I missed something? > > Regards, > Mark > > > On 10 April 2014 14:13, Cristiano Gavião <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I had a system that was developed using only Declarative Services. We are >> studying to use Subsystem to help with an isolation issue. >> >> The first problem for us is that it depends on Blueprint and we don't >> like the idea to add this overhead in this environment just to be able to >> use Subsystems. >> >> Could someone explain me this dependency? are beans being injected or >> just services? >> >> would be possible to use DS instead of Blueprint in case no bean being >> injected ? >> >> thanks >> >> Cristiano >> > > >
