Guillaume,
you removed the need of blueprint so seems to be safe to remove all
related maven dependencies from org.apache.aries.subsystem bundle pom,
don't you think ? they are still there...
regards,
Cristiano
On 15-04-2014 08:08, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The refactoring is done.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1587513
Subsystem is now completely independent of applications and blueprint
(though it will still be leveraged if present).
2014-04-14 21:35 GMT+02:00 Holly Cummins
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
If applications aren't using blueprint this analysis of blueprint
files won't be providing any useful information, so we should be
able to make something in that chain optional without loss of
function. Of course, doing that refactoring may not meet anyone's
definition of 'easy'. :)
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Actually, the Aries Application Modeller really needs Aries
Blueprint as it analyses blueprint files to find provided
services, so this dependency can't be easily removed.
Guillaume Nodet
2014-04-14 17:19 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>:
Yes, it would be nice to have subsystems being independent
of blueprint imho.
2014-04-14 16:37 GMT+02:00 Cristiano Gavião
<[email protected]>:
Hi Mark.
Well, last time I tried, the subsystems service (zero)
wasn't registered without blueprint bundles in active
state.
Seems that a dependency of subsystem,
application-modeller, has a direct dependency to
blueprint:
https://github.com/apache/aries/tree/trunk/application/application-modeller/src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/blueprint
regards,
Cristiano
On 11-04-2014 11:45, Mark Nuttall wrote:
Hello,
I've looked over the code and can only see a
dependency on blueprint in the subsystem-itests pom.
So there's a dependency on blueprint to run the
itests, but I cannot see a runtime dependency from
subsystem-core on blueprint, Have I missed something?
Regards,
Mark
On 10 April 2014 14:13, Cristiano Gavião
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I had a system that was developed using only
Declarative Services. We are studying to use
Subsystem to help with an isolation issue.
The first problem for us is that it depends on
Blueprint and we don't like the idea to add this
overhead in this environment just to be able to
use Subsystems.
Could someone explain me this dependency? are
beans being injected or just services?
would be possible to use DS instead of Blueprint
in case no bean being injected ?
thanks
Cristiano
