Guillaume, It is about the fix done for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1612 which is this change http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/aries/trunk/util/util-r42/src/main/java/org/apache/aries/util/filesystem/impl/ZipFileImpl.java?r1=1760753&r2=1760752&pathrev=1760753 .
So it is mainly about the 'util-r43' directory vs the 'util' directory at this level: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/aries/trunk/util/?pathrev=1760753 I don't understand the split and also do not know from which of them you are creating a release. If it is the util-r43 then the change is included, otherwise not? Tom Op ma 17 okt. 2016 om 13:14 schreef Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>: > Unless someone can be more precise, I investigated and I haven't found any > issue with the way the code has been changed. It should be included in the > release which is being voted. > > 2016-10-17 12:37 GMT+02:00 Tom De Wolf <tom.dew...@aca-it.be>: > > For clarity, who is expected to apply the performance fix on aries utils > in the correct directory of the code base? I understand that this is a > pre-requisite to get a new release of aries utils out? > > Tom > > Op do 13 okt. 2016 om 10:44 schreef Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>: > > Mmh, actually, the fix seems correct to me. > But if the signature generation failed for you, I'll cut a new release > anyway... > > 2016-10-13 10:42 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com>: > > That would be great, thanks Guillaume! > > David > > > On 13 October 2016 at 09:40, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote: > > I have another bundle to release, jmx-core, so I can do both if you want. > > 2016-10-13 10:38 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com>: > > I started to prepare the release, but didn't call it as I was having > problems with the signature generation. > > I will drop the staging repositories that I have been working with. Once > the fix has been put in the correct location we can restart the release. > > Cheers, > > David > > On 13 October 2016 at 09:34, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote: > > It seems the release has been cut already, and the fix is not in the > util directory, but, as you said, in the util-r42 directory. > Btw, the util-r42 jar is not even a bundle, is it used at all ? > > 2016-10-13 9:22 GMT+02:00 Wouter Bancken <wouter.banc...@aca-it.be>: > > That would be great David! > > Before releasing, can you double check the release will contain the fix > since there was some confusion regarding the util & util-r42 folders in > the pull request. > > Thanks! > > Wouter > > > > David > > On 12 October 2016 at 20:46, Wouter Bancken <wouter.banc...@aca-it.be> > wrote: > > Dear, > > ARIES-1612 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1612> delivered a > major performance improvement in the installation of subsystems. The bugfix > has already been merged to trunk and a new Aries Util release would > enormously help our day-to-day operations. > > Can someone create a new release of Aries Util? > > Best regards, > Wouter Bancken > > > > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Red Hat, Open Source Integration > > Email: gno...@redhat.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Red Hat, Open Source Integration > > Email: gno...@redhat.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Red Hat, Open Source Integration > > Email: gno...@redhat.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Red Hat, Open Source Integration > > Email: gno...@redhat.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >
