Thanks, but I don't think that would work with the Confluent Schema
Registry. This answer from Niel Drummond
<http://stackoverflow.com/a/40865366/864684> on StackOverflow should be
correct.
On 29 November 2016 at 11:24, suraj acharya <suraj....@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can try to create a schema with information somewhat like this
>
> {
> "name": "person",
> "type": "record",
> "fields": [
> {"name": "firstname", "type": "string"},
> {"name": "lastname", "type": "string"},
> {
> "name": "address",
> "type": {[ "AddressUSRecord" , "null"]
> },
> }
> ]
> },
> {"name" : "AddressUSRecord",
> "type" : "record",
> "fields" : [
> {"name": "streetaddress", "type": "string"},
> {"name": "city", "type": "string"}
> ]
> }
>
> This way, the AddressUSRecord can be used from some other place, say
> billing.
> Hope that helps.
>
> -Suraj Acharya
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Tianxiang Xiong <tianxiang.xiong@
> fundingcircle.com> wrote:
>
>> I posted a question on StackOverflow
>> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40854529/nesting-avro-schemas> r.e.
>> nesting records in Avro. I think it'll be helpful to make it available here
>> on the mailing list as well, since the Avro community is not very active on
>> SO:
>>
>> According to this question
>> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11764287/how-to-nest-records-in-an-avro-schema>
>> on
>> nesting Avro schemas, the right way to nest a record schema is as follows:
>>
>> {
>> "name": "person",
>> "type": "record",
>> "fields": [
>> {"name": "firstname", "type": "string"},
>> {"name": "lastname", "type": "string"},
>> {
>> "name": "address",
>> "type": {
>> "type" : "record",
>> "name" : "AddressUSRecord",
>> "fields" : [
>> {"name": "streetaddress", "type": "string"},
>> {"name": "city", "type": "string"}
>> ]
>> },
>> }
>> ]}
>>
>> I don't like giving the field the name address and having to give a
>> different name (AddressUSRecord) to the field's schema. Can I give the
>> field and schema the same name, address?
>>
>> What if I want to use the AddressUSRecord schema in multiple other
>> schemas, not just person? If I want to use AddressUSRecord in another
>> schema, let's say business, do I have to name it something else?
>>
>> Ideally, I'd like to define AddressUSRecord in a separate schema, then
>> let the type of addressreference AddressUSRecord. However, it's not
>> clear that Avro 1.8.1 supports this out-of-the-box. This 2014 article
>> <http://www.treselle.com/blog/advanced-avro-schema-design-reuse/> shows
>> that sub-schemas need to be handled with custom code. What the best way to
>> define reusable schemas in Avro 1.8.1?
>>
>> *Note*: I'd like a solution that works with Confluent Inc.'s Schema
>> Registry. There's a Google Groups thread
>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/confluent-platform/pey5-AS1NSE> that
>> seems to suggest that Schema Registry does not play nice with schema
>> references.
>> --
>>
>> *Tianxiang Xiong *| Clojure Engineer
>>
>> *tianxiang.xi...@fundingcircle.com <tianxiang.xi...@fundingcircle.com>*
>>
>> 747 Front Street, Floor 4 | San Francisco, CA 94111
>>
>
>
--
*Tianxiang Xiong *| Clojure Engineer
*tianxiang.xi...@fundingcircle.com <tianxiang.xi...@fundingcircle.com>*
747 Front Street, Floor 4 | San Francisco, CA 94111
