Chris, When you so patch, does that mean for Cassandra or your own internal codebase?
Sounds interesting thanks! On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Chris Goffinet <goffi...@digg.com> wrote: > That's not true. We have been using the Zookeper work we posted on jira. > That's what we are using internally and have been for months. We are now > just wrapping up our vector clocks + distributed counter patch so we can > begin transitioning away from the Zookeeper approach because there are > problems with it long-term. > > -Chris > > On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Ryan King wrote: > > > They don't use cassandra for it yet. > > > > -ryan > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:00 AM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From what I read in another thread, Cassandra isn't used for isn't > 'ideal' > >> for keeping track of counts. > >> For example, I would undertand this to mean keeping track of which > stories > >> were dugg. > >> If this is true, how would a site like digg keep track of the 'dugg' > >> counter? > >> Also, I am assuming with eventual consistancy the number *may* not be > 100% > >> accurate. If you wanted it to be accurate, would you just use the > Quorom > >> flag? (I believe quorom is to ensure all writes are written to disk) > >
