Follow-up from last weeks discussion, I've been playing around with a simple column comparator for composite column names that I put up on github. I'd be interested to hear what people think of this approach.
http://github.com/edanuff/CassandraCompositeType Ed On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Ed Anuff <e...@anuff.com> wrote: > It might make sense to create a CompositeType subclass of AbstractType for > the purpose of constructing and comparing these types of "composite" column > names so that if you could more easily do that sort of thing rather than > having to concatenate into one big string. > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Mike Malone <m...@simplegeo.com> wrote: > >> The only thing SuperColumns appear to buy you (as someone pointed out to >> me at the Cassandra meetup - I think it was Eric Florenzano) is that you can >> use different comparator types for the Super/SubColumns, I guess..? But you >> should be able to do the same thing by creating your own Column comparator. >> I guess my point is that SuperColumns are mostly a convenience mechanism, as >> far as I can tell. >> >> Mike >> > >
