I've seen numerous anecdotal references that the Sun JVM performs better.

Is there a reason why the debian packaging for Cassandra installs the OpenJDK 
version? 
What would it take to create an alternative apt-get package that pulls Sun JVM 
rather than OpenJDK?

-phil

On May 27, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Daniel Kluesing wrote:

> 0.6.0 had some gc issues, (I think 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1014) if you see lots of gc 
> collections in the logs, I’d give 0.6.1 a try, I found it much better.
>  
> Anecdotally, the sun jvm performs better than openJDK, and the u19 drop fixes 
> some jvm bugs that can cause memory problems. Sun jvm, u19 (or higher) and 
> Cassandra 0.6.1 fixed a lot of memory problems I ran into.
>  
> From: James Golick [mailto:jamesgol...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:05 AM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Continuously increasing RAM usage
>  
> When I say unresponsive, I mean that latency becomes very high. Swap is 
> turned off, but before I turned it on, it used to swap heavily at this point.
>  
> Cassandra version is 0.6.0 Beta1
>  
> [cassandra1 ~]# java -version
> java version "1.6.0"
> OpenJDK  Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-b09)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0-b09, mixed mode)
>  
> Here is the tpstats from a node that was restarted last night:
>  
> http://gist.github.com/415987
>  
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Robert Coli <rc...@digg.com> wrote:
> On 5/26/10 11:32 PM, James Golick wrote:
> We're seeing RAM usage continually climb until eventually, cassandra becomes 
> unresponsive.
> Given the handful of bugs related to memory bloat in specific versions of 
> Cassandra combined with specific versions of JVMs, that information may be 
> relevant to your question. What version are you running, and in what JVM 
> environment?
> 
> =Rob
> 
>  

Reply via email to