Wouldn't something like Redis be a better fit than Cassandra? On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Tong Zhu <tong....@rms.com> wrote: > If it is a really session data, which will be active for a short time, a few > hours, and it is OK to lose them, memcached is a better solution. I were > using it when I was in Yahoo. > > Tong > > -----Original Message----- > From: buddhasystem [mailto:potek...@bnl.gov] > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:57 AM > To: cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: cassandra as session store > > > For completeness: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3746685/running-django-site-in-multiserver-environment-how-to-handle-sessions > http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/http/sessions/#using-cached-sessions > > I guess your approach does make sense, one only wishes that the servlet in > question did more work for you. If I read correctly, Django can cache > sessions transparently in memcached. So memcached mecomes your Session > Management System. Is it better or worse than Cassandra? My feeling is that > it's probably faster and easier to set up. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/cassandra-as-session-store-tp5981871p5982024.html > Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > This message and any attachments contain information that may be RMS Inc. > confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient (or > authorized to receive for the intended recipient), and have received this > message in error, any use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender > immediately by replying to the e-mail and permanently deleting the message > from your computer and/or storage system. >
-- Maybe she awoke to see the roommate's boyfriend swinging from the chandelier wearing a boar's head. Something which you, I, and everyone else would call "Tuesday", of course.
