I wasn't clear on that. What I mean was would scrub putting data in at state that might have caused the repair consume a lot of disk space?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:44 PM, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>wrote: > No scrub is a local operation only. > > Cheers > > ----------------- > Aaron Morton > Freelance Cassandra Developer > @aaronmorton > http://www.thelastpickle.com > > On 19/08/2011, at 6:36 AM, Huy Le wrote: > > Thanks. I won't try that then. > > So in our environment, after upgrading from 0.6.11 to 0.8.4, we have to run > scrub on all nodes before we can run repair on them. Is there any chance > that running scrub on the nodes causing data from all SSTables being > streamed to/from other nodes on running repair? > > Huy > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Philippe <watche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Unfortunately repairing one cf at a time didn't help in my case because it >> still streams all CF and that triggers lots of compactions >> On Aug 18, 2011 3:48 PM, "Huy Le" <hu...@springpartners.com> wrote: >> > > > > -- > Huy Le > Spring Partners, Inc. > http://springpadit.com > > > -- Huy Le Spring Partners, Inc. http://springpadit.com
