Thanks! A useful contribution, no matter what the outcome. I trust your ability to read of the doc, so I don't expect a lot of change to the responses, but we'll see. At a minimum, it will probably be good to have doc to highlight areas where users will need to engage in explicit mitigation efforts if their infrastructure does not implicitly effect mitigation for various security exposures.
-- Jack Krupansky On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:21 PM, oleg yusim <olegyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Robert, Jack, Bryan, > > As you suggested, I put together document, titled > Cassandra_Security_Topics_to_Discuss, put it on Google Drive and shared it > with everybody on this list. The document contains list of questions I have > on Cassandra, my take on it, and has a place for notes Community would like > to make on it. > > Please, review. Any help would be appreciated greatly. > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2L9nW4Cyj41YWd1UkI4ZXVPYmM > > Oleg > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Bryan Cheng <br...@blockcypher.com> > wrote: > >> To throw my (unsolicited) 2 cents into the ring, Oleg, you work for a >> well-funded and fairly large company. You are certainly free to continue >> using the list and asking for community support (I am definitely not in any >> position to tell you otherwise, anyway), but that community support is by >> definition ad-hoc and best effort. Furthermore, your questions range from >> trivial to, as Jonathan as mentioned earlier, concepts that many of us have >> no reason to consider at this time (perhaps your work will convince us >> otherwise- but you'll need to finish it first ;) ) >> >> What I'm getting at here is that perhaps, if you need faster, deeper >> level, and more elaborate support than this list can provide, you should >> look into the services of a paid Cassandra support company like Datastax. >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Jack Krupansky < >>> jack.krupan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> One last time, I'll simply renew my objection to the way you are >>>> abusing this list. >>>> >>> >>> FWIW, while I appreciate that OP (Oleg) is attempting to do a service >>> for the community, I agree that the flood of single topic, context-lacking >>> posts regarding deep internals of Cassandra is likely to inspire the >>> opposite of a helpful response. >>> >>> This is important work, however, so hopefully we can collectively find a >>> way through the meta and can discuss this topic without acrimony! :D >>> >>> =Rob >>> >>> >> >> >
