David J. Biesack wrote on Monday, October 08, 2007 4:40 PM: >> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:23:59 +0200 >> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Schaible?= > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> David J. Biesack wrote on Monday, October 08, 2007 3:02 PM: >> >>>> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 23:31:19 -0500 >>>> From: "Qingtian Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>> Well, it's pick-your-poison kind of a deal. Either block on one >>>> instance and take a performance hit, or burn up the memory with >>>> lots of instances..... >>> >>> Why not compromise? Create a ThreadPoolExecutor ... >> >> Because it runs on JDK 1.3? > > The java.util.concurrent backport > http://backport-jsr166.sourceforge.net/ runs on 1.3, for just this > kind of use.
I know this, but I doubt that we wanna start to depend Apache common components on it ;-) - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
